Calculation of Relative Uncertainty When Measuring Physical Constants: CODATA Technique Vs Information Method

Main Article Content

Boris Menin

Abstract

Aims: To analyze the results of measurements of the Boltzmann, gravitational and Planck constants using a theoretically sound information approach in comparison with the CODATA technique.

Place and Duration of Study: Beer-Sheba, between January 2019 and May 2019.

Methodology: Using the concepts of information theory, the amount of information contained in the measurement model of a physical constant is calculated. This allows us to find the value of the comparative uncertainty proposed by Brillouin, and the achievable value of the relative uncertainty, taking into account the basic SI values used on each test bench when measuring physical constants.

Results: An unsolved question was to find the amount of information contained in the model of the measurement of a physical constant, which can be converted to the value of the achievable absolute uncertainty. This value now has an exact analytical formula. It is notoriously difficult to study the consistency of the measurement results of physical constants, but the proposed mathematical tool, developed using the concepts of information theory, allow us to simplify the analysis completely.

Conclusion: The information method leads to an intuitive and logically justified calculation of the relative uncertainty, which is compatible with the current practice of CODATA. This allows you to identify the threshold discrepancy between the model and the object under study. Proof of this is the calculation of the achievable value of the relative uncertainty when measuring the Boltzmann, gravitational and Planck constants. The proposed information-oriented method for calculating the relative uncertainty in measuring physical constants represents a new tool when formulating a modernized SI.

Keywords:
Boltzmann, gravitational and planck constants, CODATA, information theory, least squares correction, relative uncertainty

Article Details

How to Cite
Menin, B. (2019). Calculation of Relative Uncertainty When Measuring Physical Constants: CODATA Technique Vs Information Method. Physical Science International Journal, 22(4), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.9734/psij/2019/v22i430136
Section
Original Research Article

References

Schlamminger S, Abbott P, Kubarych Z, Jarrett D, Elmquist RE. The units for mass, voltage, resistance, and current in the SI. IEEE Instrum Meas. 2019;22(3):1-16.
(Accessed 5 June 2019)
DOI: 10.1109/MIM.2019.8716269.

Pavese F. The new SI and the CODATA recommended values of the fundamental constants 2017 compared with 2014. 2018;1-11.
(Accessed 5 June 2019)
Available:https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1512/1512.03668.pdf.

Menin B. Simplest method for calculating the lowest achievable uncertainty of model at measurements of fundamental physical constants. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics. 2017;5(11):2162-71.
(Accessed 5 June 2019)
Available: https://goo.gl/XcCCX5.

Menin B. The Boltzmann constant: Evaluation of measurement relative uncertainty using the information approach. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics. 2019;7(3):486-504.
(Accessed 5 June 2019)
Available: 10.4236/jamp.2019.73035.

Menin B. Precise measurements of the gravitational constant: Revaluation by the information approach. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics. 2019;7(6):1272-1288.
(Accessed 29 June 2019)
Available: http://file.scirp.org/pdf/JAMP_2019062614403787.pdf.

Menin B. Progress in reducing the uncertainty of measurement of Planck’s constant in terms of the information approach. Physical Science International Journal. 2019;21(2):1-11.
(Accessed: 5 June 2019)
Available:http://www.journalpsij.com/index.php/PSIJ/article/view/30104/56478.

NIST Special Publication 330 (SP330). The International System of Units (SI); 2008.
(Accessed 5 June 2019)
Available:http://physics.nist.gov/Pubs/SP330/sp330.pdf.

Brillouin L. Science and information theory. New York: Dover; 2004.

Mohr PJ, Newell DB, Taylor BN, Tiesinga E. Data and analysis for the CODATA 2017 special fundamental constants adjustment for the revision of the SI. Metrologia. 2018;55(1):125-46.
(Accessed 5 June 2019)
Available: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1681-7575/aa99bc/pdf.

Merkatas C, Toman B, Possolo A, Schlamminger S. Shades of dark uncertainty and consensus value for the Newtonian constant of gravitation. 2019;1-39.
(Accessed: 5 June 2019)
Available: arXiv:1905.09551v1 [physics. data-an] 23 May 2019.